Clicky

Fujifilm S8200 vs Ricoh CX4

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
42
Overall
40
Fujifilm FinePix S8200 front
 
Ricoh CX4 front
Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
34
Overall
33

Fujifilm S8200 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs

Fujifilm S8200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-960mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Introduced January 2013
Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Launched August 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm S8200 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview

Let's look more closely at the Fujifilm S8200 versus Ricoh CX4, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S8200 (16MP) and CX4 (10MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The Fujifilm S8200 was brought out 2 years after the CX4 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S8200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.

Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the Fujifilm S8200 matches up versus the CX4 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8200 over the Ricoh CX4

 Fujifilm S8200 CX4 
LaunchedJanuary 2013August 2010Newer by 30 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Fujifilm S8200

 CX4 Fujifilm S8200 
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm S8200 and Ricoh CX4

 Fujifilm S8200 CX4 
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen sizing
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm S8200 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to travel with your camera, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S8200 comes with outside dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Ricoh CX4 has proportions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).

Look at the Fujifilm S8200 versus Ricoh CX4 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S8200 and the CX4.

Fujifilm S8200 vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S8200 and CX4 is 61 and 92 respectively.

Fujifilm S8200 vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S8200 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions simply by looking at specs. The pic here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S8200 and CX4.

All in all, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Fujifilm S8200 to give extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm S8200 provides an advantage in sensor technology.

Fujifilm S8200 vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S8200 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S8200 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S8200 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh CX4 as a Portrait photography camera
40
has manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
26
manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm S8200
Street photography with Ricoh CX4
41
image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
more heavy than competitors (670 grams)
60
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S8200 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh CX4 Sports photography highlights
50
excellent zoom range (24-960mm 40.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
24
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm S8200
Travel photography with Ricoh CX4
52
good MP (16MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
great zoom (960mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors (670 grams)
does not have a selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
66
lighter than competition (205 grams)
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
resolution not great (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S8200 Landscape photography info
Ricoh CX4 Landscape photography info
47
has manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
42
manual focus
decently wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not possible
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S8200 Vlogging factors
Ricoh CX4 Vlogging factors
24
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
does not have a selfie friendly display
lack of external microphone support
more heavy than competitors (670g)
30
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm S8200 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S8200 and Ricoh CX4
 Fujifilm FinePix S8200Ricoh CX4
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Ricoh
Model Fujifilm FinePix S8200 Ricoh CX4
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2013-01-07 2010-08-19
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 12800 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-960mm (40.0x) 28-300mm (10.7x)
Highest aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.5-5.6
Macro focus distance 0cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 460k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 200k dots -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1700 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 10.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 4.00 m
Flash modes - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 670g (1.48 pounds) 205g (0.45 pounds)
Physical dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 4 x AA DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $450 $211