Clicky

Fujifilm S8200 vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
42
Overall
40
Fujifilm FinePix S8200 front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Fujifilm S8200 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Fujifilm S8200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-960mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Released January 2013
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Fujifilm S8200 vs Samsung WB35F Overview

Here is a extended analysis of the Fujifilm S8200 and Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S8200 (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively close and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The Fujifilm S8200 was launched 12 months before the WB35F and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S8200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a quick view of how the Fujifilm S8200 scores versus the WB35F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8200 over the Samsung WB35F

 Fujifilm S8200 WB35F 
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Fujifilm S8200

 WB35F Fujifilm S8200 
IntroducedJanuary 2014January 2013Fresher by 12 months

Common features in the Fujifilm S8200 and Samsung WB35F

 Fujifilm S8200 WB35F 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm S8200 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you have to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm S8200 features external dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has specifications of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Look at the Fujifilm S8200 and Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm S8200 vs the WB35F.

Fujifilm S8200 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S8200 and WB35F is 61 and 93 respectively.

Fujifilm S8200 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S8200 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

Often, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing merely by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S8200 and WB35F.

As you can see, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same MP and you can expect comparable quality of files though you have to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The older Fujifilm S8200 will be behind in sensor tech.

Fujifilm S8200 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S8200 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S8200 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S8200 Portrait photography information
Samsung WB35F Portrait photography information
40
manual focus
decent MP (16 megapixels)
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
37
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16MP)
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm S8200
Street photography with Samsung WB35F
41
has image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
heavier than competitors (670 grams)
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194g)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S8200 Sports photography advice
Samsung WB35F Sports photography advice
50
great zoom range (24-960mm 40.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
40
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S8200 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Travel photography camera
52
decent MP (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long reach (960mm)
no Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors (670 grams)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
70
lighter than competition (194g)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
long reach (288mm)
missing Timelapse mode
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm S8200
Landscape photography with Samsung WB35F
47
manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
no Time Lapse function
43
focusing manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S8200 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB35F as a Vlogging camera
24
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
no mic jack
heavier than competitors (670g)
31
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing microphone jack
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Fujifilm S8200 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S8200 and Samsung WB35F
 Fujifilm FinePix S8200Samsung WB35F
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Samsung
Model type Fujifilm FinePix S8200 Samsung WB35F
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2013-01-07 2014-01-07
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 12800 3200
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-960mm (40.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Max aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focusing distance 0cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 200k dot -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/1700s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 10.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 670 grams (1.48 lbs) 194 grams (0.43 lbs)
Physical dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 4 x AA BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $450 $130