Fujifilm S8200 vs Sony QX1
61 Imaging
39 Features
42 Overall
40
90 Imaging
62 Features
48 Overall
56
Fujifilm S8200 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm S8200 vs Sony QX1 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Fujifilm S8200 and Sony QX1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Lens-style by manufacturers FujiFilm and Sony. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S8200 (16MP) and the QX1 (20MP) is fairly well matched but the Fujifilm S8200 (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm S8200 was manufactured 20 months before the QX1 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S8200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the Fujifilm S8200 grades against the QX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm S8200 vs Sony QX1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S8200 & Sony Alpha QX1. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm S8200 Gallery & Sony QX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8200 over the Sony QX1
| Fujifilm S8200 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 0k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Fujifilm S8200
| QX1 | Fujifilm S8200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 | January 2013 | More recent by 20 months | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm S8200 and Sony QX1
| Fujifilm S8200 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Fujifilm S8200 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S8200 features external dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Sony QX1 has measurements of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm S8200 and Sony QX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm S8200 versus the QX1.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S8200 and QX1 is 61 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm S8200 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements only by reading through technical specs. The visual underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S8200 and QX1.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm S8200 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony QX1 will give you more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The older Fujifilm S8200 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Fujifilm S8200 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm S8200 vs Sony QX1 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S8200 | Sony Alpha QX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S8200 | Sony Alpha QX1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Lens-style |
| Released | 2013-01-07 | 2014-09-03 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 357.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 16000 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 0cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | - |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200k dot | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | - | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 670 gr (1.48 lbs) | 216 gr (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 440 photographs |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $450 | $500 |