Fujifilm S8300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0400f/0400ffe4c6c8a4a12f6fb66387756458a0f0ee99" alt="Fujifilm FinePix S8300 front Fujifilm FinePix S8300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/077c8/077c8d0ffde6e06784e3efdfa010c6cd7eb8c7da" alt="Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front"
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49
Fujifilm S8300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/7000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1008mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Introduced January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Fujifilm S8300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Overview
Lets look closer at the Fujifilm S8300 versus Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S8300 (16MP) and Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The Fujifilm S8300 was manufactured 12 months before the Astro Zoom AZ651 so they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm S8300 matches up versus the Astro Zoom AZ651 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Fujifilm S8300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix S8300 and Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm S8300 Gallery and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8300 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Fujifilm S8300 | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
---|
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Fujifilm S8300
Astro Zoom AZ651 | Fujifilm S8300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 12 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm S8300 and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Fujifilm S8300 | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm S8300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S8300 has outside measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).
See the Fujifilm S8300 versus Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm S8300 versus the Astro Zoom AZ651.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e1fa/8e1faa571e2729b46144b452ef8e84acdfdadfdc" alt="Fujifilm S8300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 size comparison Fujifilm S8300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S8300 and Astro Zoom AZ651 is 61 and 65 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbdf2/fbdf2551c76f994878eb2306814964ab9a98b5b9" alt="Fujifilm S8300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S8300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm S8300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to envision the gap in sensor sizing only by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S8300 and Astro Zoom AZ651.
As you can see, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to produce more detail due to its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The older Fujifilm S8300 will be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbd51/dbd518871bf07a439f5ed404bf1d89579428bed6" alt="Fujifilm S8300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 sensor size comparison Fujifilm S8300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm S8300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/147e6/147e63814d2310aa9e629a56ec92438a1a65b8ba" alt="Fujifilm S8300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S8300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Fujifilm S8300 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S8300 | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix S8300 | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-01-07 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 21MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1008mm (42.0x) | 24-1560mm (65.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 0cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/7000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 670 grams (1.48 lbs) | 567 grams (1.25 lbs) |
Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $200 | $419 |