Clicky

Fujifilm S8300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S8300 front
 
Olympus SP-565UZ front
Portability
72
Imaging
33
Features
32
Overall
32

Fujifilm S8300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs

Fujifilm S8300
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1/7000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1008mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Launched January 2013
Olympus SP-565UZ
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
  • Released January 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm S8300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview

Below is a complete assessment of the Fujifilm S8300 and Olympus SP-565UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm S8300 (16MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The Fujifilm S8300 was revealed 4 years later than the SP-565UZ and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S8300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm S8300 grades versus the SP-565UZ when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8300 over the Olympus SP-565UZ

 Fujifilm S8300 SP-565UZ 
ReleasedJanuary 2013January 2009More recent by 49 months
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Fujifilm S8300

 SP-565UZ Fujifilm S8300 

Common features in the Fujifilm S8300 and Olympus SP-565UZ

 Fujifilm S8300 SP-565UZ 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Fujifilm S8300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison

If you are planning to lug around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S8300 provides physical measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-565UZ has proportions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).

Analyze the Fujifilm S8300 and Olympus SP-565UZ in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm S8300 against the SP-565UZ.

Fujifilm S8300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S8300 and SP-565UZ is 61 and 72 respectively.

Fujifilm S8300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S8300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements just by reading technical specs. The graphic underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S8300 and SP-565UZ.

As you have seen, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should expect to see the Fujifilm S8300 to offer more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a little more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm S8300 should have an advantage in sensor technology.

Fujifilm S8300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S8300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S8300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S8300 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus SP-565UZ as a Portrait photography camera
40
has manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
39
manual focus
exports RAW files
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm S8300
Street photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
41
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
heavier than competitors (670g)
56
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S8300 Sports photography details
Olympus SP-565UZ Sports photography details
53
long zoom range (24-1008mm 42.0 x zoom)
high shutter speed (1/7,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
33
excellent zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
max fps very slow (1.0 frames per second)
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm S8300
Travel photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
52
good MP (16MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1008mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than competitors (670 grams)
does not have a selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.9)
52
has built in flash
fairly wide (26mm)
great zoom (520mm)
does not have Timelapse function
low MP (10MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S8300 Landscape photography info
Olympus SP-565UZ Landscape photography info
47
has manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
40
manual focus
fairly wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S8300 Vlogging info
Olympus SP-565UZ Vlogging info
24
fairly wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
does not have a selfie friendly display
lack of mic support
heavier than competitors (670 grams)
24
fairly wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have microphone port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm S8300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S8300 and Olympus SP-565UZ
 Fujifilm FinePix S8300Olympus SP-565UZ
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm FinePix S8300 Olympus SP-565UZ
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2013-01-07 2009-01-15
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 12800 6400
Lowest native ISO 64 64
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - 143
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-1008mm (42.0x) 26-520mm (20.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/2.8-4.5
Macro focus range 0cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 2.5 inch
Display resolution 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 200k dot -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 1s
Highest shutter speed 1/7000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 10.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 6.40 m (ISO 200)
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 670 gr (1.48 lb) 413 gr (0.91 lb)
Dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 30
DXO Color Depth score not tested 18.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.1
DXO Low light score not tested 68
Other
Battery model 4 x AA 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC xD Picture Card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $200 $400