Clicky

Fujifilm S8300 vs Ricoh CX4

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S8300 front
 
Ricoh CX4 front
Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
34
Overall
33

Fujifilm S8300 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs

Fujifilm S8300
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1/7000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1008mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Launched January 2013
Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Announced August 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm S8300 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview

Here is a in-depth comparison of the Fujifilm S8300 versus Ricoh CX4, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S8300 (16MP) and CX4 (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm S8300 was revealed 2 years later than the CX4 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S8300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.

Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the Fujifilm S8300 scores versus the CX4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8300 over the Ricoh CX4

 Fujifilm S8300 CX4 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013August 2010Fresher by 30 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Fujifilm S8300

 CX4 Fujifilm S8300 
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm S8300 and Ricoh CX4

 Fujifilm S8300 CX4 
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch screen Neither offers Touch screen

Fujifilm S8300 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry your camera often, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S8300 offers physical measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Ricoh CX4 has dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm S8300 versus Ricoh CX4 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm S8300 against the CX4.

Fujifilm S8300 vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S8300 and CX4 is 61 and 92 respectively.

Fujifilm S8300 vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S8300 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizing simply by checking specifications. The graphic here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S8300 and CX4.

To sum up, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Fujifilm S8300 to resolve greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm S8300 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Fujifilm S8300 vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S8300 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S8300 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S8300 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh CX4 as a Portrait photography camera
40
manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
26
focusing manually
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
low megapixels (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S8300 Street photography factors
Ricoh CX4 Street photography factors
41
image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
heavier than average in class (670g)
60
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm S8300
Sports photography with Ricoh CX4
53
long zoom range (24-1008mm 42.0 x zoom)
max shutter speed is good (1/7,000s)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
24
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority
low megapixels (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S8300 Travel photography info
Ricoh CX4 Travel photography info
52
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1008mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than average in class (670g)
does not have a selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.9)
66
lighter than competition (205 grams)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
long reach (300mm)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S8300 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh CX4 Landscape photography highlights
47
manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse function
42
focusing manually
fairly wide (28mm)
screen is a good size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not available
low megapixels (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S8300 Vlogging advice
Ricoh CX4 Vlogging advice
24
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
does not have a selfie friendly display
doesn't have external mic socket
heavier than average in class (670g)
30
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm S8300 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S8300 and Ricoh CX4
 Fujifilm FinePix S8300Ricoh CX4
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Ricoh
Model type Fujifilm FinePix S8300 Ricoh CX4
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2013-01-07 2010-08-19
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 12800 3200
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-1008mm (42.0x) 28-300mm (10.7x)
Maximum aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.5-5.6
Macro focusing range 0cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 460 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 200 thousand dot -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/7000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 10.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 4.00 m
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 670g (1.48 pounds) 205g (0.45 pounds)
Physical dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 4 x AA DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $200 $211