Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung SL102
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/7000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1008mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Alternate Name is ES55
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Here is a in depth analysis of the Fujifilm S8300 versus Samsung SL102, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm S8300 (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm S8300 was announced 4 years later than the SL102 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S8300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief view of how the Fujifilm S8300 grades vs the SL102 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S8300 and Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm S8300 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8300 over the Samsung SL102
| Fujifilm S8300 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 | January 2009 | Fresher by 49 months | |
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Fujifilm S8300
| SL102 | Fujifilm S8300 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S8300 and Samsung SL102
| Fujifilm S8300 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm S8300 provides external dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm S8300 versus Samsung SL102 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm S8300 against the SL102.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S8300 and SL102 is 61 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing merely by going over a spec sheet. The graphic below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S8300 and SL102.
As you can see, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Fujifilm S8300 to offer more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm S8300 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S8300 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S8300 | Samsung SL102 |
| Alternative name | - | ES55 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-01-07 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1008mm (42.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dot | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/7000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash settings | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 gr (1.48 pounds) | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $200 | $130 |