Clicky

Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung SL102

Portability
61
Imaging
39
Features
44
Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S8300 front
 
Samsung SL102 front
Portability
96
Imaging
32
Features
21
Overall
27

Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs

Fujifilm S8300
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1/7000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1008mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Released January 2013
Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F) lens
  • 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2009
  • Alternate Name is ES55
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung SL102 Overview

Here is a in depth analysis of the Fujifilm S8300 versus Samsung SL102, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm S8300 (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Fujifilm S8300 was announced 4 years later than the SL102 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S8300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief view of how the Fujifilm S8300 grades vs the SL102 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8300 over the Samsung SL102

 Fujifilm S8300 SL102 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013January 2009Fresher by 49 months
Focus manually More precise focus
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Fujifilm S8300

 SL102 Fujifilm S8300 

Common features in the Fujifilm S8300 and Samsung SL102

 Fujifilm S8300 SL102 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm S8300 provides external dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

Analyze the Fujifilm S8300 versus Samsung SL102 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm S8300 against the SL102.

Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung SL102 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S8300 and SL102 is 61 and 96 respectively.

Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing merely by going over a spec sheet. The graphic below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S8300 and SL102.

As you can see, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Fujifilm S8300 to offer more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm S8300 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S8300 Portrait photography factors
Samsung SL102 Portrait photography factors
39
you can focus manually
decent MP (16MP)
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
24
offers face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
low resolution (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S8300 Street photography information
Samsung SL102 Street photography information
41
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
more heavy than competition in class (670 grams)
55
lighter than competition (116 grams)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S8300 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Sports photography camera
52
excellent zoom range (24-1008mm 42.0 x zoom)
high shutter speed (1/7,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
16
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low resolution (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm S8300
Travel photography with Samsung SL102
52
decent MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1008mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (670g)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
61
lighter than competition (116 grams)
has built in flash
very good max aperture (f)
no Time Lapse recording
low resolution (10MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (35mm)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S8300 Landscape photography info
Samsung SL102 Landscape photography info
46
you can focus manually
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
26
very good max aperture (f)
manual focus not available
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
tiny screen (2.5")
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
low resolution (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S8300 Vlogging details
Samsung SL102 Vlogging details
24
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
does not have microphone jack
more heavy than competition in class (670 grams)
29
very good max aperture (f)
offers face detection autofocus
lighter than competition (116g)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
does not contain selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
no external mic port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S8300 and Samsung SL102
 Fujifilm FinePix S8300Samsung SL102
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Samsung
Model type Fujifilm FinePix S8300 Samsung SL102
Alternative name - ES55
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Released 2013-01-07 2009-01-08
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 12800 1600
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-1008mm (42.0x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Max aperture f/2.9-6.5 -
Macro focusing distance 0cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 2.5 inches
Display resolution 460 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 200 thousand dot -
Features
Min shutter speed 8s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/7000s 1/1500s
Continuous shutter speed 10.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash settings - Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 670 gr (1.48 pounds) 116 gr (0.26 pounds)
Physical dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 4 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $200 $130