Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung WB35F
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
93 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/7000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1008mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm S8300 (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm S8300 was revealed 12 months prior to the WB35F which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S8300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm S8300 grades versus the WB35F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S8300 & Samsung WB35F. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm S8300 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8300 over the Samsung WB35F
| Fujifilm S8300 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Fujifilm S8300
| WB35F | Fujifilm S8300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 | January 2013 | More modern by 12 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm S8300 and Samsung WB35F
| Fujifilm S8300 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S8300 has got exterior dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has proportions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm S8300 vs the WB35F.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S8300 and WB35F is 61 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specifications. The image below should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S8300 and WB35F.
Plainly, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of photos although you need to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged Fujifilm S8300 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm S8300 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S8300 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S8300 | Samsung WB35F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-01-07 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1008mm (42.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dots | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/7000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 grams (1.48 lbs) | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $200 | $130 |