Clicky

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S8400W front
 
Olympus SP-565UZ front
Portability
72
Imaging
33
Features
32
Overall
32

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs

Fujifilm S8400W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1056mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Launched March 2013
Olympus SP-565UZ
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview

The following is a complete assessment of the Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S8400W (16MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Fujifilm S8400W was brought out 4 years after the SP-565UZ which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S8400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.

Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the Fujifilm S8400W scores vs the SP-565UZ when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8400W over the Olympus SP-565UZ

 Fujifilm S8400W SP-565UZ 
RevealedMarch 2013January 2009Newer by 51 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Fujifilm S8400W

 SP-565UZ Fujifilm S8400W 

Common features in the Fujifilm S8400W and Olympus SP-565UZ

 Fujifilm S8400W SP-565UZ 
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Neither includes Touch screen

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S8400W features physical measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Olympus SP-565UZ has sizing of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).

Analyze the Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S8400W vs the SP-565UZ.

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S8400W and SP-565UZ is 61 and 72 respectively.

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading specifications. The image here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S8400W and SP-565UZ.

Plainly, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Fujifilm S8400W to offer you extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm S8400W should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S8400W Portrait photography advice
Olympus SP-565UZ Portrait photography advice
40
has manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
39
has manual focus
delivers RAW formats
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S8400W as a Street photography camera
Olympus SP-565UZ as a Street photography camera
41
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
more heavy than average (670 grams)
56
has image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S8400W Sports photography features
Olympus SP-565UZ Sports photography features
53
amazing zoom range (24-1056mm 44.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
33
excellent zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
low frames per second (1.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm S8400W
Travel photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
52
good MP (16MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1056mm)
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than average (670 grams)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.9)
52
has built in flash
really wide (26mm)
great reach (520mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm S8400W
Landscape photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
47
has manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Timelapse function
40
has manual focus
really wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.5")
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S8400W Vlogging factors
Olympus SP-565UZ Vlogging factors
24
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
missing external microphone port
more heavy than average (670 grams)
24
really wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm S8400W vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S8400W and Olympus SP-565UZ
 Fujifilm FinePix S8400WOlympus SP-565UZ
General Information
Make FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix S8400W Olympus SP-565UZ
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2013-03-22 2009-01-15
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 12800 6400
Minimum native ISO 64 64
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 143
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-1056mm (44.0x) 26-520mm (20.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/2.8-4.5
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 2.5 inch
Resolution of screen 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 201k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 97 percent -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s 1s
Fastest shutter speed 1/1700s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 10.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 7.00 m 6.40 m (ISO 200)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format H.264 -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 670 grams (1.48 lbs) 413 grams (0.91 lbs)
Physical dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 30
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 18.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.1
DXO Low light rating not tested 68
Other
Battery life 300 photos -
Battery style AA -
Battery ID 4 x AA 4 x AA
Self timer - Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC xD Picture Card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $300 $400