Fujifilm S8400W vs Ricoh CX6
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
92 Imaging
33 Features
38 Overall
35
Fujifilm S8400W vs Ricoh CX6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1056mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Announced March 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 201g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed November 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm S8400W vs Ricoh CX6 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Fujifilm S8400W and Ricoh CX6, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm S8400W (16MP) and CX6 (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm S8400W was revealed 17 months after the CX6 making them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S8400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX6 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm S8400W scores against the CX6 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm S8400W vs Ricoh CX6 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S8400W and Ricoh CX6. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S8400W Gallery and Ricoh CX6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8400W over the Ricoh CX6
| Fujifilm S8400W | CX6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2013 | November 2011 | More modern by 17 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX6 over the Fujifilm S8400W
| CX6 | Fujifilm S8400W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1230k | 460k | Clearer display (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S8400W and Ricoh CX6
| Fujifilm S8400W | CX6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S8400W vs Ricoh CX6 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S8400W offers outside measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Ricoh CX6 has measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm S8400W and Ricoh CX6 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm S8400W compared to the CX6.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S8400W and CX6 is 61 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm S8400W vs Ricoh CX6 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes purely by viewing a spec sheet. The image here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S8400W and CX6.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should anticipate the Fujifilm S8400W to render extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm S8400W provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm S8400W vs Ricoh CX6 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Fujifilm S8400W vs Ricoh CX6 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S8400W | Ricoh CX6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S8400W | Ricoh CX6 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-03-22 | 2011-11-15 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1056mm (44.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 1,230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | Sony WhiteMagic VGA LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 670 gr (1.48 lb) | 201 gr (0.44 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Battery form | AA | - |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | DB-100 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $300 | $595 |