Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung ST95
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1056mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched March 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung ST95, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S8400W (16MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is very well matched and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm S8400W was launched 2 years after the ST95 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S8400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm S8400W scores versus the ST95 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S8400W and Samsung ST95. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm S8400W Gallery and Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8400W over the Samsung ST95
| Fujifilm S8400W | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2013 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 27 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Fujifilm S8400W
| ST95 | Fujifilm S8400W |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S8400W and Samsung ST95
| Fujifilm S8400W | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S8400W has got exterior measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Samsung ST95 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
See the Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung ST95 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm S8400W and the ST95.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S8400W and ST95 is 61 and 99 respectively.
Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading through specifications. The pic here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S8400W and ST95.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same MP and you should expect similar quality of photographs though you might want to factor the release date of the products into consideration. The more modern Fujifilm S8400W provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S8400W | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S8400W | Samsung ST95 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2013-03-22 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | - |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1056mm (44.0x) | () |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 670 grams (1.48 pounds) | - |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Battery format | AA | - |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $300 | $145 |