Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung TL500
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/512bb/512bbee0e7ca7703ba6c42c2e4cab9dd6b1c7d47" alt="Fujifilm FinePix S8400W front Fujifilm FinePix S8400W front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3208c/3208cbdbdd11e23eae5a341ac80491dad70aec44" alt="Samsung TL500 front Samsung TL500 front"
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1056mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released March 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Released July 2010
- Alternate Name is EX1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung TL500 Overview
The following is a detailed review of the Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung TL500, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S8400W (16MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the Fujifilm S8400W (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") provide different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The Fujifilm S8400W was introduced 2 years after the TL500 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S8400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung TL500 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the Fujifilm S8400W grades against the TL500 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S8400W and Samsung TL500. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S8400W Gallery and Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8400W over the Samsung TL500
Fujifilm S8400W | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2013 | ![]() | July 2010 | Newer by 33 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Fujifilm S8400W
TL500 | Fujifilm S8400W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+154k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm S8400W and Samsung TL500
Fujifilm S8400W | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S8400W provides outer dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Samsung TL500 has sizing of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung TL500 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm S8400W versus the TL500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c265/2c2655a31fe01e069574a5fee9b5e4013632001d" alt="Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung TL500 size comparison Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung TL500 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S8400W and TL500 is 61 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6be3b/6be3b43d5524cfff72e93702ccf32d7b7ddd7f79" alt="Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung TL500 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung TL500 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions only by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S8400W and TL500.
As you can see, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm S8400W with its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh harder and the Fujifilm S8400W will provide you with more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm S8400W provides a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1786/b178615e9c606d8544ab333b50e89304464e4be5" alt="Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung TL500 sensor size comparison Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung TL500 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6fa73/6fa73aabd02257bc5707f41c0b9fdaa29bc80715" alt="Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung TL500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung TL500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S8400W | Samsung TL500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S8400W | Samsung TL500 |
Also referred to as | - | EX1 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-03-22 | 2010-07-09 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1056mm (44.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/1.8-2.4 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 201 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m | 5.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 670g (1.48 lb) | 386g (0.85 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 129 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Form of battery | AA | - |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | SLB-07A |
Self timer | - | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $300 | $527 |