Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung WB350F
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1056mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Revealed March 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Revealed January 2014
Photography Glossary Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Fujifilm S8400W versus Samsung WB350F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S8400W (16MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is pretty close and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm S8400W was unveiled 9 months before the WB350F and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S8400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm S8400W matches up against the WB350F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix S8400W & Samsung WB350F. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm S8400W Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8400W over the Samsung WB350F
| Fujifilm S8400W | WB350F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Fujifilm S8400W
| WB350F | Fujifilm S8400W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | March 2013 | More modern by 9 months |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm S8400W and Samsung WB350F
| Fujifilm S8400W | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera, you should factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S8400W has got external dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has sizing of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm S8400W versus Samsung WB350F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm S8400W against the WB350F.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S8400W and WB350F is 61 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S8400W and WB350F.
As you can see, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution and you can expect comparable quality of pictures although you would want to take the age of the cameras into account. The more aged Fujifilm S8400W will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm S8400W vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S8400W | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S8400W | Samsung WB350F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-03-22 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1056mm (44.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 gr (1.48 pounds) | 276 gr (0.61 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Form of battery | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | SLB-10A |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $300 | $260 |