Fujifilm S8400W vs Sony H200
Portability
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Portability
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Fujifilm S8400W vs Sony H200 Key Specs
Fujifilm S8400W
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1056mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Revealed March 2013
Sony H200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Launched January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm S8400W vs Sony H200 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Fujifilm S8400W vs Sony H200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Sony. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S8400W (16MP) and the H200 (20MP) is relatively close and they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm S8400W was introduced 3 months later than the H200 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple summary of how the Fujifilm S8400W scores versus the H200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm S8400W vs Sony H200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S8400W & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S8400W Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8400W over the Sony H200
| Fujifilm S8400W | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Fujifilm S8400W
| H200 | Fujifilm S8400W |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S8400W and Sony H200
| Fujifilm S8400W | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2013 |  | January 2013 | Same age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Fujifilm S8400W vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S8400W provides physical dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Sony H200 has measurements of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") along with a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
See the Fujifilm S8400W vs Sony H200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S8400W compared to the H200.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S8400W and H200 is 61 and 67 respectively.
Fujifilm S8400W vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by looking through technical specs. The photograph here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S8400W and H200.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Sony H200 to provide you with more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively.
Fujifilm S8400W vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm S8400W Portrait photography features
Sony H200 Portrait photography features
manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
good MP (20 megapixels)
has face detect focus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Fujifilm S8400W Street photography features
Sony H200 Street photography features
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than average in class (670 grams)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
heavier than average in class (530g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Fujifilm S8400W Sports photography factors
Sony H200 Sports photography factors
excellent zoom range (24-1056mm 44.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
long zoom range (24-633mm 26.4 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (20 megapixels)
has tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (240 CIPA)
has no phase detect auto focus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Fujifilm S8400W as a Travel photography camera
Sony H200 as a Travel photography camera
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
long zoom (1056mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than average in class (670g)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
good MP (20MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
long zoom (633mm)
no Time Lapse mode
not so great battery pack (240 per charge)
heavier than average in class (530g)
does not posses selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm S8400W Landscape photography details
Sony H200 Landscape photography details
manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
quite wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (20MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
lack of manual mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
not so great battery pack (240 CIPA)
no Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S8400W Vlogging information
Sony H200 Vlogging information
quite wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone support
more heavy than average in class (670 grams)
quite wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
does not posses selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic support
heavier than average in class (530g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm S8400W vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S8400W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S8400W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-03-22 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1056mm (44.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 20cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 6.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 670 grams (1.48 lbs) | 530 grams (1.17 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | 240 photos |
| Battery style | AA | AA |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $250 |