Fujifilm S8400W vs Sony S950
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Fujifilm S8400W vs Sony S950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1056mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Announced March 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Video
- 33-132mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 93 x 56 x 24mm
- Introduced February 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm S8400W vs Sony S950 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Fujifilm S8400W versus Sony S950, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm S8400W (16MP) and S950 (10MP) but they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm S8400W was announced 4 years after the S950 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S8400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony S950 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm S8400W matches up versus the S950 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm S8400W vs Sony S950 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S8400W & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm S8400W Gallery & Sony S950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8400W over the Sony S950
| Fujifilm S8400W | S950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2013 | February 2009 | Newer by 50 months | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S950 over the Fujifilm S8400W
| S950 | Fujifilm S8400W |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S8400W and Sony S950
| Fujifilm S8400W | S950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Fujifilm S8400W vs Sony S950 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S8400W has got outer dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Sony S950 has proportions of 93mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm S8400W versus Sony S950 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S8400W vs the S950.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S8400W and S950 is 61 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm S8400W vs Sony S950 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions simply by viewing technical specs. The pic here might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S8400W and S950.
As you have seen, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Fujifilm S8400W to result in more detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm S8400W should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm S8400W vs Sony S950 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm S8400W vs Sony S950 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S8400W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S8400W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-03-22 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1056mm (44.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 670g (1.48 pounds) | 167g (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 93 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Type of battery | AA | - |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $300 | $130 |