Fujifilm S8500 vs Nikon A900
61 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
88 Imaging
45 Features
58 Overall
50
Fujifilm S8500 vs Nikon A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/7000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1104mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Announced February 2016
- New Model is Nikon A1000
Photography Glossary Fujifilm S8500 vs Nikon A900 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Fujifilm S8500 versus Nikon A900, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Nikon. The resolution of the Fujifilm S8500 (16MP) and the A900 (20MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm S8500 was launched 4 years earlier than the A900 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S8500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon A900 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief view of how the Fujifilm S8500 matches up against the A900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm S8500 vs Nikon A900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S8500 and Nikon Coolpix A900. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S8500 Gallery and Nikon A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8500 over the Nikon A900
| Fujifilm S8500 | A900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Fujifilm S8500
| A900 | Fujifilm S8500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 | January 2013 | Newer by 38 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S8500 and Nikon A900
| Fujifilm S8500 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm S8500 vs Nikon A900 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S8500 provides external dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Nikon A900 has sizing of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm S8500 versus Nikon A900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S8500 versus the A900.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S8500 and A900 is 61 and 88 respectively.
Fujifilm S8500 vs Nikon A900 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to see the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by looking at a spec sheet. The pic underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S8500 and A900.
Clearly, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Nikon A900 to resolve more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm S8500 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm S8500 vs Nikon A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm S8500 vs Nikon A900 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S8500 | Nikon Coolpix A900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S8500 | Nikon Coolpix A900 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-01-07 | 2016-02-23 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1104mm (46.0x) | 24-840mm (35.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.4-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200k dots | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/7000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 670 gr (1.48 lb) | 289 gr (0.64 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $500 | $400 |