Fujifilm S8500 vs Ricoh CX3
61 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Fujifilm S8500 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/7000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1104mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm S8500 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Fujifilm S8500 vs Ricoh CX3, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S8500 (16MP) and CX3 (10MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm S8500 was unveiled 2 years later than the CX3 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S8500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a quick overview of how the Fujifilm S8500 grades versus the CX3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm S8500 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S8500 & Ricoh CX3. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S8500 Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8500 over the Ricoh CX3
| Fujifilm S8500 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 32 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Fujifilm S8500
| CX3 | Fujifilm S8500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S8500 and Ricoh CX3
| Fujifilm S8500 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Fujifilm S8500 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S8500 comes with external dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Ricoh CX3 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm S8500 vs Ricoh CX3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm S8500 vs the CX3.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S8500 and CX3 is 61 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm S8500 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specifications. The visual here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S8500 and CX3.
To sum up, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Fujifilm S8500 to deliver extra detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm S8500 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm S8500 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm S8500 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S8500 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S8500 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-01-07 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1104mm (46.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200k dot | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/7000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 grams (1.48 lb) | 206 grams (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $500 | $329 |