Fujifilm S8500 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
61 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39


85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Fujifilm S8500 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/7000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1104mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Introduced March 2010

Fujifilm S8500 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Below is a in depth review of the Fujifilm S8500 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm S8500 (16MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the Fujifilm S8500 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor dimensions.

The Fujifilm S8500 was launched 2 years later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S8500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm S8500 scores vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Fujifilm S8500 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S8500 & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm S8500 Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8500 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Fujifilm S8500 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | March 2010 | More recent by 35 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Fujifilm S8500
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Fujifilm S8500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S8500 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Fujifilm S8500 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm S8500 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S8500 features physical measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm S8500 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S8500 vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S8500 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 61 and 85 respectively.

Fujifilm S8500 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to visualise the difference in sensor measurements only by seeing a spec sheet. The visual here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S8500 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Clearly, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm S8500 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Fujifilm S8500 will produce more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm S8500 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm S8500 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S8500 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S8500 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S8500 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2013-01-07 | 2010-03-18 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1104mm (46.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 200k dots | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 180 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/7000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.50 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 670 grams (1.48 pounds) | 355 grams (0.78 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $500 | $349 |