Fujifilm S8500 vs Samsung SL202
61 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Fujifilm S8500 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/7000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1104mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL50
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm S8500 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Fujifilm S8500 and Samsung SL202, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm S8500 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm S8500 was manufactured 3 years after the SL202 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S8500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm S8500 matches up vs the SL202 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm S8500 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix S8500 & Samsung SL202. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S8500 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8500 over the Samsung SL202
| Fujifilm S8500 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 48 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Fujifilm S8500
| SL202 | Fujifilm S8500 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S8500 and Samsung SL202
| Fujifilm S8500 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Fujifilm S8500 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S8500 features outer dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Fujifilm S8500 and Samsung SL202 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S8500 versus the SL202.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S8500 and SL202 is 61 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm S8500 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions purely by viewing technical specs. The pic below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S8500 and SL202.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Fujifilm S8500 to result in extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm S8500 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm S8500 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm S8500 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S8500 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S8500 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-07 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1104mm (46.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 0cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200k dots | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/7000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670g (1.48 pounds) | 168g (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $500 | $140 |