Fujifilm S8500 vs Sigma DP2
61 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
86 Imaging
43 Features
28 Overall
37
Fujifilm S8500 vs Sigma DP2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/7000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1104mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Introduced September 2009
- Newer Model is Sigma DP2s
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm S8500 vs Sigma DP2 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Fujifilm S8500 vs Sigma DP2, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Sigma. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S8500 (16MP) and DP2 (5MP) and the Fujifilm S8500 (1/2.3") and DP2 (APS-C) offer different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm S8500 was revealed 3 years later than the DP2 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S8500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sigma DP2 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm S8500 scores vs the DP2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm S8500 vs Sigma DP2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix S8500 and Sigma DP2. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S8500 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8500 over the Sigma DP2
| Fujifilm S8500 | DP2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | September 2009 | More recent by 41 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 over the Fujifilm S8500
| DP2 | Fujifilm S8500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm S8500 and Sigma DP2
| Fujifilm S8500 | DP2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Fujifilm S8500 vs Sigma DP2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S8500 has got physical measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 has dimensions of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") along with a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm S8500 vs Sigma DP2 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S8500 and the DP2.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S8500 and DP2 is 61 and 86 respectively.
Fujifilm S8500 vs Sigma DP2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to picture the contrast between sensor measurements only by checking technical specs. The visual underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S8500 and DP2.
As you have seen, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm S8500 having a tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh harder and the Fujifilm S8500 will resolve greater detail because of its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm S8500 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm S8500 vs Sigma DP2 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm S8500 vs Sigma DP2 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S8500 | Sigma DP2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Sigma |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S8500 | Sigma DP2 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-01-07 | 2009-09-21 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1104mm (46.0x) | 41mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 200 thousand dots | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 15s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/7000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.30 m |
| Flash options | - | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 320x240 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 670 gr (1.48 lbs) | 280 gr (0.62 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $500 | $649 |