Fujifilm S9200 vs Kodak Z981
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
66 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Fujifilm S9200 vs Kodak Z981 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 540g - 124 x 85 x 105mm
- Introduced July 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm S9200 vs Kodak Z981 Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Fujifilm S9200 and Kodak Z981, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. The resolution of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and the Z981 (14MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm S9200 was revealed 3 years later than the Z981 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm S9200 scores vs the Z981 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm S9200 vs Kodak Z981 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix S9200 and Kodak EasyShare Z981. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9200 Gallery and Kodak Z981 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Kodak Z981
| Fujifilm S9200 | Z981 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | July 2010 | More recent by 43 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 201k | Crisper screen (+259k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z981 over the Fujifilm S9200
| Z981 | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Kodak Z981
| Fujifilm S9200 | Z981 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm S9200 vs Kodak Z981 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm S9200 provides exterior dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Kodak Z981 has specifications of 124mm x 85mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") and a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm S9200 and Kodak Z981 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 vs the Z981.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9200 and Z981 is 61 and 66 respectively.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Kodak Z981 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements just by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph below should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S9200 and Z981.
As you can see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should expect the Fujifilm S9200 to provide you with greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm S9200 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Kodak Z981 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm S9200 vs Kodak Z981 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Kodak EasyShare Z981 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Kodak EasyShare Z981 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2014-01-06 | 2010-07-06 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 201k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 6.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 gr (1.48 lbs) | 540 gr (1.19 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 124 x 85 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $300 | $299 |