Clicky

Fujifilm S9200 vs Kodak Z981

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S9200 front
 
Kodak EasyShare Z981 front
Portability
66
Imaging
37
Features
37
Overall
37

Fujifilm S9200 vs Kodak Z981 Key Specs

Fujifilm S9200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Announced January 2014
Kodak Z981
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 540g - 124 x 85 x 105mm
  • Introduced July 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm S9200 vs Kodak Z981 Overview

In this article, we will be reviewing the Fujifilm S9200 and Kodak Z981, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. The resolution of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and the Z981 (14MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Fujifilm S9200 was revealed 3 years later than the Z981 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).

Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm S9200 scores vs the Z981 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Kodak Z981

 Fujifilm S9200 Z981 
IntroducedJanuary 2014July 2010More recent by 43 months
Screen resolution460k201kCrisper screen (+259k dot)

Reasons to pick Kodak Z981 over the Fujifilm S9200

 Z981 Fujifilm S9200 
Manually focus Very accurate focus

Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Kodak Z981

 Fujifilm S9200 Z981 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen size
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither provides Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm S9200 vs Kodak Z981 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm S9200 provides exterior dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Kodak Z981 has specifications of 124mm x 85mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") and a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs).

Check the Fujifilm S9200 and Kodak Z981 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 vs the Z981.

Fujifilm S9200 vs Kodak Z981 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9200 and Z981 is 61 and 66 respectively.

Fujifilm S9200 vs Kodak Z981 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S9200 vs Kodak Z981 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements just by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph below should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S9200 and Z981.

As you can see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should expect the Fujifilm S9200 to provide you with greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm S9200 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm S9200 vs Kodak Z981 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S9200 vs Kodak Z981 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S9200 vs Kodak Z981 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 Portrait photography details
Kodak Z981 Portrait photography details
37
good MP (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection autofocus
no manual focus
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
46
has manual focus
megapixel count good (14MP)
delivers RAW formats
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 Street photography highlights
Kodak Z981 Street photography highlights
41
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
more heavy than competition in class (670g)
50
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
heavier than competition in class (540 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 Sports photography info
Kodak Z981 Sports photography info
55
incredible zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
good battery power (500 shots)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
43
amazing zoom range (26-676mm 26.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames per second)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm S9200
Travel photography with Kodak Z981
54
good battery power (500 CIPA)
good MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
great reach (1200mm)
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (670g)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
53
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (26mm)
long reach (676mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than competition in class (540g)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm S9200
Landscape photography with Kodak Z981
44
decently wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
good battery power (500 CIPA)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Timelapse mode
51
has manual focus
relatively wide (26mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
delivers RAW formats
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 Vlogging factors
Kodak Z981 Vlogging factors
26
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
display is not selfie friendly
missing external microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (670 grams)
22
relatively wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have mic jack
heavier than competition in class (540 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm S9200 vs Kodak Z981 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9200 and Kodak Z981
 Fujifilm FinePix S9200Kodak EasyShare Z981
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Kodak
Model type Fujifilm FinePix S9200 Kodak EasyShare Z981
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2014-01-06 2010-07-06
Body design SLR-like (bridge) SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 12800 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 26-676mm (26.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/2.8-5.0
Macro focusing distance 1cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Display resolution 460k dot 201k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 201k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 97 percent -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 secs 16 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/1700 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 10.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 7.00 m 6.20 m
Flash settings Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264 H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 670 gr (1.48 lbs) 540 gr (1.19 lbs)
Dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 124 x 85 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photographs -
Style of battery AA -
Battery ID 4 x AA 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $300 $299