Fujifilm S9200 vs Nikon L840
Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Portability
67 Imaging
41 Features
48 Overall
43
67 Imaging
41 Features
48 Overall
43
Fujifilm S9200 vs Nikon L840 Key Specs
Fujifilm S9200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Introduced January 2014
Nikon L840
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-855mm (F3.0-6.5) lens
- 538g - 114 x 89 x 96mm
- Released February 2015
- Older Model is Nikon L830
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Fujifilm S9200 vs Nikon L840 Overview
Here is a thorough overview of the Fujifilm S9200 and Nikon L840, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Nikon. The resolution of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and the L840 (16MP) is very similar and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm S9200 was revealed 13 months prior to the L840 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm S9200 matches up versus the L840 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Fujifilm S9200 vs Nikon L840 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S9200 & Nikon Coolpix L840. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9200 Gallery & Nikon L840 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Nikon L840
| Fujifilm S9200 | L840 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon L840 over the Fujifilm S9200
| L840 | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 |  | January 2014 | Fresher by 13 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Nikon L840
| Fujifilm S9200 | L840 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Fujifilm S9200 vs Nikon L840 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S9200 enjoys physical dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Nikon L840 has sizing of 114mm x 89mm x 96mm (4.5" x 3.5" x 3.8") having a weight of 538 grams (1.19 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm S9200 and Nikon L840 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 vs the L840.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9200 and L840 is 61 and 67 respectively.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Nikon L840 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading technical specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S9200 and L840.
As you have seen, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical megapixels and you can expect similar quality of photos although you would want to factor the age of the products into consideration. The older Fujifilm S9200 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Nikon L840 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Portrait photography highlights
Nikon L840 Portrait photography highlights
resolution is good (16MP)
supports face detection focusing
no manual focus
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Street photography with Fujifilm S9200
Street photography with Nikon L840
image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (670 grams)
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than others (538 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Sports photography features
Nikon L840 Sports photography features
excellent zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
better than average battery pack (500 shots)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
incredible zoom range (23-855mm 37.2 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
has tracking focus
better than average battery (590 shots)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Travel photography features
Nikon L840 Travel photography features
better than average battery pack (500 per charge)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
great zoom (1200mm)
no Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (670 grams)
does not posses selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.9)
better than average battery (590 CIPA)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (23mm)
great reach (855mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than others (538g)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Landscape photography info
Nikon L840 Landscape photography info
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
better than average battery pack (500 CIPA)
no manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Timelapse function
reasonably wide (23mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
better than average battery (590 shots)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not available
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Vlogging information
Nikon L840 Vlogging information
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
does not posses selfie friendly display
no external microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (670g)
reasonably wide (23mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of microphone support
more heavy than others (538g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm S9200 vs Nikon L840 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Nikon Coolpix L840 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Nikon Coolpix L840 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-01-06 | 2015-02-10 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 23-855mm (37.2x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.0-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 7.4 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 6.90 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 grams (1.48 lbs) | 538 grams (1.19 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 114 x 89 x 96mm (4.5" x 3.5" x 3.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | 590 images |
| Style of battery | AA | AA |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SC/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $300 | $400 |
