Clicky

Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S9200 front
 
Olympus SP-800 UZ front
Portability
69
Imaging
36
Features
35
Overall
35

Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs

Fujifilm S9200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Olympus SP-800 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 1000)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
  • Launched February 2010
  • Successor is Olympus SP-810 UZ
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview

Let's look more in depth at the Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The Fujifilm S9200 was brought out 3 years after the SP-800 UZ which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.

Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm S9200 scores vs the SP-800 UZ when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ

 Fujifilm S9200 SP-800 UZ 
LaunchedJanuary 2014February 2010Newer by 48 months
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Fujifilm S9200

 SP-800 UZ Fujifilm S9200 

Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Olympus SP-800 UZ

 Fujifilm S9200 SP-800 UZ 
Manual focus Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display dimensions
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison

When you are planning to travel with your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S9200 has exterior measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Olympus SP-800 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 versus the SP-800 UZ.

Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S9200 and SP-800 UZ is 61 and 69 respectively.

Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison

Often, its hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions just by viewing technical specs. The pic below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S9200 and SP-800 UZ.

As you can tell, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should anticipate the Fujifilm S9200 to provide you with more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm S9200 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 Portrait photography factors
Olympus SP-800 UZ Portrait photography factors
37
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
28
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
no manual control
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 Street photography highlights
Olympus SP-800 UZ Street photography highlights
41
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
heavier than competition (670g)
46
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 Sports photography features
Olympus SP-800 UZ Sports photography features
55
great zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
great battery power (500 per charge)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
46
incredible zoom range (28-840mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 Travel photography advice
Olympus SP-800 UZ Travel photography advice
54
great battery power (500 shots)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1200mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (670 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
61
MP count decent (14MP)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
very long zoom (840mm)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 Landscape photography info
Olympus SP-800 UZ Landscape photography info
44
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
great battery power (500 shots)
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
41
really wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
no manual control
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm S9200
Vlogging with Olympus SP-800 UZ
26
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external mic port
heavier than competition (670 grams)
24
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm S9200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9200 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
 Fujifilm FinePix S9200Olympus SP-800 UZ
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm FinePix S9200 Olympus SP-800 UZ
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2014-01-06 2010-02-02
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 12800 3200
Maximum boosted ISO - 1000
Lowest native ISO 100 64
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 143
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 28-840mm (30.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/2.8-5.6
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 460 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 201 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 97% -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds 12 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1700 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 10.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 7.00 m 3.10 m
Flash options Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264 H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 670 gr (1.48 pounds) 455 gr (1.00 pounds)
Physical dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 shots -
Battery style AA -
Battery model 4 x AA Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $300 $270