Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS80
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
![Fujifilm FinePix S9200 front Fujifilm FinePix S9200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-S9200/Fujifilm-S9200-front.jpg)
![Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 front Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Panasonic-Lumix-DC-ZS80/Panasonic-ZS80-front.jpg)
86 Imaging
47 Features
70 Overall
56
Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 327g - 112 x 69 x 42mm
- Launched February 2018
- Other Name is Lumix DC-TZ95
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS70
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS80 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS80, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and the ZS80 (20MP) is fairly similar and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm S9200 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the ZS80 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Panasonic ZS80 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm S9200 matches up versus the ZS80 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS80 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S9200 and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm S9200 Gallery and Panasonic ZS80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Panasonic ZS80
Fujifilm S9200 | ZS80 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS80 over the Fujifilm S9200
ZS80 | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | ![]() | January 2014 | More modern by 50 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Panasonic ZS80
Fujifilm S9200 | ZS80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS80 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S9200 comes with exterior measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS80 has measurements of 112mm x 69mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 327 grams (0.72 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS80 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 against the ZS80.
![Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS80 size comparison Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS80 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S9200-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DC-ZS80-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9200 and ZS80 is 61 and 86 respectively.
![Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS80 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS80 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S9200-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DC-ZS80-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS80 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S9200 and ZS80.
As you can see, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Panasonic ZS80 to offer you greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm S9200 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
![Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS80 sensor size comparison Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS80 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S9200-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DC-ZS80-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS80 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S9200-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DC-ZS80-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS80 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Panasonic |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 |
Also called | - | Lumix DC-TZ95 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2014-01-06 | 2018-02-18 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 201k dot | 2,330k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m | 5.60 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 670g (1.48 pounds) | 327g (0.72 pounds) |
Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 112 x 69 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 380 photos |
Type of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $300 | $448 |