Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic FZ300
Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Portability
59 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
59 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic FZ300 Key Specs
Fujifilm S9200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Revealed January 2014
Panasonic FZ300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/16000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 691g - 132 x 92 x 117mm
- Launched July 2015
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ200
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic FZ300 Overview
Here is a thorough overview of the Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic FZ300, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and FZ300 (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm S9200 was released 18 months before the FZ300 making them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the Fujifilm S9200 matches up vs the FZ300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic FZ300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S9200 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9200 Gallery & Panasonic FZ300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Panasonic FZ300
| Fujifilm S9200 | FZ300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ300 over the Fujifilm S9200
| FZ300 | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2015 |  | January 2014 | Fresher by 18 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+580k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Panasonic FZ300
| Fujifilm S9200 | FZ300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic FZ300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S9200 features outside measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ300 has proportions of 132mm x 92mm x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") along with a weight of 691 grams (1.52 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic FZ300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 vs the FZ300.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9200 and FZ300 is 61 and 59 respectively.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic FZ300 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing merely by looking through specifications. The photograph underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S9200 and FZ300.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Fujifilm S9200 to provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The older Fujifilm S9200 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic FZ300 Portrait photography highlights
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
features face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
you can focus manually
provides face detection focusing
saves RAW files
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Street photography info
Panasonic FZ300 Street photography info
image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (670 grams)
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
boasts focus via touch
weather proofing
very small sensor (1/2.3")
heavier than average (691 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Sports photography info
Panasonic FZ300 Sports photography info
amazing zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
features tracking focus
great battery pack (500 shots)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
amazing zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
max shutter speed is good (1/16,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking autofocus
weather proofing
better than average battery (380 CIPA)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Travel photography information
Panasonic FZ300 Travel photography information
great battery pack (500 per charge)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
great zoom (1200mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (670g)
does not have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
better than average battery (380 CIPA)
weather proofing
boasts focus via touch
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
decently wide (25mm)
long zoom (600mm)
heavier than average (691 grams)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic FZ300 as a Landscape photography camera
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
great battery pack (500 CIPA)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
you can focus manually
decently wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
weather proofing
better than average battery (380 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic FZ300 as a Vlogging camera
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
does not have selfie friendly screen
doesn't have microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (670g)
decently wide (25mm)
selfie friendly screen
touch screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focusing
high res video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
includes external mic socket
slow max aperture (f2.8)
heavier than average (691g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic FZ300 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Panasonic |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-01-06 | 2015-07-16 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 49 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 1,040k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201k dots | 1,440k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/16000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 12.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 8.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 670g (1.48 lb) | 691g (1.52 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 132 x 92 x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | 380 pictures |
| Form of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $300 | $598 |
