Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS35
Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Portability
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
Fujifilm S9200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released January 2014
Panasonic ZS35
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Introduced January 2014
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS30
- Updated by Panasonic ZS40
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS35, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and the ZS35 (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm S9200 was announced about the same time to the ZS35 which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm S9200 matches up against the ZS35 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S9200 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm S9200 Gallery & Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Panasonic ZS35
| Fujifilm S9200 | ZS35 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Fujifilm S9200
| ZS35 | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Panasonic ZS35
| Fujifilm S9200 | ZS35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | January 2014 | Similar age |
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S9200 comes with outside measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS35 has sizing of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS35 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 compared to the ZS35.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S9200 and ZS35 is 61 and 89 respectively.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S9200 and ZS35.
Clearly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of pictures but you really should take the launch date of the products into consideration.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Portrait photography factors
Panasonic ZS35 Portrait photography factors
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
provides face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Street photography details
Panasonic ZS35 Street photography details
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (670g)
tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (305g)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Sports photography details
Panasonic ZS35 Sports photography details
long zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (500 per charge)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
great zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Travel photography details
Panasonic ZS35 Travel photography details
better than average battery life (500 shots)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
great reach (1200mm)
does not have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (670 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
lighter than competitors (305g)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long reach (480mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Landscape photography information
Panasonic ZS35 Landscape photography information
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
better than average battery life (500 shots)
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic ZS35 as a Vlogging camera
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have external microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (670 grams)
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors (305 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
does not have external microphone jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm S9200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Panasonic |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
| Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-01-06 | 2014-01-06 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 21 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 6.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 gr (1.48 lbs) | 305 gr (0.67 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | - |
| Battery format | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $300 | $300 |