Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh CX3
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released June 2010
Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Fujifilm S9200 versus Ricoh CX3, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and CX3 (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm S9200 was launched 3 years later than the CX3 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the Fujifilm S9200 scores versus the CX3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S9200 & Ricoh CX3. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9200 Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Ricoh CX3
Fujifilm S9200 | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | June 2010 | More recent by 44 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Fujifilm S9200
CX3 | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Ricoh CX3
Fujifilm S9200 | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm S9200 offers physical dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX3 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm S9200 versus Ricoh CX3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 compared to the CX3.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9200 and CX3 is 61 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to visualise the difference in sensor measurements simply by seeing a spec sheet. The visual below will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S9200 and CX3.
As you can see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Fujifilm S9200 to provide more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm S9200 is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Ricoh CX3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Ricoh CX3 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2014-01-06 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 201 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 670 gr (1.48 lbs) | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) |
Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | - |
Battery style | AA | - |
Battery model | 4 x AA | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $300 | $329 |