Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- New Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Fujifilm S9200 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is pretty similar and they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm S9200 was introduced about the same time to the WG-4 GPS so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the Fujifilm S9200 scores vs the WG-4 GPS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix S9200 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S9200 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| Fujifilm S9200 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Fujifilm S9200
| WG-4 GPS | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| Fujifilm S9200 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 | February 2014 | Similar age | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S9200 has got outside measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm S9200 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 against the WG-4 GPS.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S9200 and WG-4 GPS is 61 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading technical specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S9200 and WG-4 GPS.
As you have seen, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution so you can expect similar quality of images but you should consider the launch date of the products into consideration.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm S9200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2014-01-06 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 gr (1.48 lb) | 235 gr (0.52 lb) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | 240 pictures |
| Battery type | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $210 |