Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung DV300F
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung DV300F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Announced January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung DV300F Overview
Lets look much closer at the Fujifilm S9200 versus Samsung DV300F, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and the DV300F (16MP) is very comparable and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm S9200 was launched 2 years later than the DV300F and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung DV300F being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm S9200 matches up against the DV300F for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung DV300F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S9200 & Samsung DV300F. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9200 Gallery & Samsung DV300F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Samsung DV300F
| Fujifilm S9200 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 | January 2012 | More recent by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Fujifilm S9200
| DV300F | Fujifilm S9200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Samsung DV300F
| Fujifilm S9200 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Exact same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung DV300F Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you need to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm S9200 has physical measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Samsung DV300F has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm S9200 versus Samsung DV300F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 against the DV300F.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9200 and DV300F is 61 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung DV300F Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements purely by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S9200 and DV300F.
As you can see, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of images though you have to factor the age of the cameras into account. The fresher Fujifilm S9200 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung DV300F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Samsung DV300F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Samsung DV300F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-01-06 | 2012-01-02 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 4.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 670 gr (1.48 lb) | 133 gr (0.29 lb) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
| Battery form | AA | - |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | BP88 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $300 | $200 |