Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41


90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Released August 2012

Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Overview
Following is a extensive assessment of the Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and the Galaxy Camera 4G (16MP) is very well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The Fujifilm S9200 was announced 17 months after the Galaxy Camera 4G making them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm S9200 matches up vs the Galaxy Camera 4G for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S9200 & Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S9200 Gallery & Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
Fujifilm S9200 | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | ![]() | August 2012 | More modern by 17 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 0k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G over the Fujifilm S9200
Galaxy Camera 4G | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 4.8" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+1.8") |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
Fujifilm S9200 | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S9200 has got physical dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G has dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 compared to the Galaxy Camera 4G.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9200 and Galaxy Camera 4G is 61 and 90 respectively.

Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes just by looking at technical specs. The pic below will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S9200 and Galaxy Camera 4G.
As you can tell, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical MP therefore you can expect similar quality of files but you should always take the age of the products into consideration. The fresher Fujifilm S9200 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2014-01-06 | 2012-08-29 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | - |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 4.8" |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 0k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 201k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1700s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 670 gr (1.48 pounds) | 305 gr (0.67 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
Battery type | AA | - |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $300 | $550 |