Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung NX200
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
62 Features
57 Overall
60
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Earlier Model is Samsung NX100
- Later Model is Samsung NX210
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung NX200 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Fujifilm S9200 versus Samsung NX200, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and the NX200 (20MP) is pretty close but the Fujifilm S9200 (1/2.3") and NX200 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm S9200 was unveiled 23 months later than the NX200 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm S9200 grades vs the NX200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix S9200 and Samsung NX200. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9200 Gallery and Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Samsung NX200
Fujifilm S9200 | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | February 2012 | More recent by 23 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Fujifilm S9200
NX200 | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen resolution | 614k | 460k | Crisper screen (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Samsung NX200
Fujifilm S9200 | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm S9200 has outside dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Samsung NX200 has specifications of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm S9200 versus Samsung NX200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 vs the NX200.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S9200 and NX200 is 61 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to envision the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through technical specs. The photograph here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S9200 and NX200.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm S9200 having a smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Samsung NX200 will render extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm S9200 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Samsung NX200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Samsung NX200 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2014-01-06 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 15 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 201k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 670 grams (1.48 lb) | 223 grams (0.49 lb) |
Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 618 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 330 photos |
Battery form | AA | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $300 | $818 |