Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung SL102
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41


96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55

Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Lets look closer at the Fujifilm S9200 and Samsung SL102, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The Fujifilm S9200 was unveiled 5 years after the SL102 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm S9200 grades against the SL102 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix S9200 & Samsung SL102. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm S9200 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Samsung SL102
Fujifilm S9200 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 61 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Fujifilm S9200
SL102 | Fujifilm S9200 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Samsung SL102
Fujifilm S9200 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S9200 has got outer dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm S9200 and Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 against the SL102.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9200 and SL102 is 61 and 96 respectively.

Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading through specifications. The pic underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S9200 and SL102.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Fujifilm S9200 to give you extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm S9200 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Samsung SL102 |
Otherwise known as | - | ES55 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-01-06 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 201k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 670 grams (1.48 lbs) | 116 grams (0.26 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | - |
Type of battery | AA | - |
Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $300 | $130 |