Clicky

Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung SL102

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S9200 front
 
Samsung SL102 front
Portability
96
Imaging
32
Features
21
Overall
27

Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs

Fujifilm S9200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F) lens
  • 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
  • Launched January 2009
  • Alternative Name is ES55
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung SL102 Overview

Lets look closer at the Fujifilm S9200 and Samsung SL102, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Fujifilm S9200 was unveiled 5 years after the SL102 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm S9200 grades against the SL102 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Samsung SL102

 Fujifilm S9200 SL102 
LaunchedJanuary 2014January 2009More modern by 61 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Fujifilm S9200

 SL102 Fujifilm S9200 

Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Samsung SL102

 Fujifilm S9200 SL102 
Manually focus Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S9200 has got outer dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm S9200 and Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 against the SL102.

Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung SL102 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9200 and SL102 is 61 and 96 respectively.

Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading through specifications. The pic underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S9200 and SL102.

To sum up, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Fujifilm S9200 to give you extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm S9200 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm S9200
Portrait photography with Samsung SL102
37
decent MP (16MP)
supports face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
24
includes face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
MP count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 Street photography information
Samsung SL102 Street photography information
41
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
heavier than competition in class (670g)
55
lighter than average (116 grams)
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 Sports photography details
Samsung SL102 Sports photography details
55
amazing zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
good battery life (500 shots)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
16
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 Travel photography information
Samsung SL102 Travel photography information
54
good battery life (500 CIPA)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
very long reach (1200mm)
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (670g)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
61
lighter than average (116g)
has built in flash
great maximum aperture (f)
does not have Timelapse mode
MP count low (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 Landscape photography info
Samsung SL102 Landscape photography info
44
pretty wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
good battery life (500 shots)
lack of manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
26
great maximum aperture (f)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
small screen (2.5 inch)
no manual mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
does not have Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm S9200
Vlogging with Samsung SL102
26
pretty wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
no mic support
heavier than competition in class (670g)
29
great maximum aperture (f)
includes face detection focusing
lighter than average (116g)
wide angle not good (35mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external microphone support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9200 and Samsung SL102
 Fujifilm FinePix S9200Samsung SL102
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Samsung
Model Fujifilm FinePix S9200 Samsung SL102
Otherwise known as - ES55
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2014-01-06 2009-01-08
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 12800 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.9-6.5 -
Macro focus range 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 2.5 inches
Resolution of screen 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 201k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 97 percent -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/1700s 1/1500s
Continuous shutter rate 10.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 7.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 670 grams (1.48 lbs) 116 grams (0.26 lbs)
Physical dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photos -
Type of battery AA -
Battery model 4 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $300 $130