Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST700
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
99 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 99 x 55 x 20mm
- Launched January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST700 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Fujifilm S9200 versus Samsung ST700, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and the ST700 (16MP) is very well matched and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm S9200 was announced 3 years after the ST700 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST700 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a brief view of how the Fujifilm S9200 scores vs the ST700 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST700 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S9200 & Samsung ST700. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9200 Gallery & Samsung ST700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Samsung ST700
| Fujifilm S9200 | ST700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 37 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST700 over the Fujifilm S9200
| ST700 | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Samsung ST700
| Fujifilm S9200 | ST700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST700 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S9200 enjoys external dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST700 has sizing of 99mm x 55mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm S9200 versus Samsung ST700 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 vs the ST700.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9200 and ST700 is 61 and 99 respectively.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST700 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions only by checking specs. The image below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S9200 and ST700.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution and you can expect similar quality of files but you might want to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The newer Fujifilm S9200 should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST700 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST700 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Samsung ST700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Samsung ST700 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2014-01-06 | 2011-01-05 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | () |
| Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 670 gr (1.48 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 99 x 55 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | AA | - |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $300 | $280 |