Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST95
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Fujifilm S9200 versus Samsung ST95, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is relatively comparable and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm S9200 was unveiled 3 years after the ST95 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm S9200 matches up against the ST95 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S9200 & Samsung ST95. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9200 Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Samsung ST95
| Fujifilm S9200 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 37 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Fujifilm S9200
| ST95 | Fujifilm S9200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Samsung ST95
| Fujifilm S9200 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S9200 enjoys physical measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Samsung ST95 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm S9200 versus Samsung ST95 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 vs the ST95.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9200 and ST95 is 61 and 99 respectively.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes merely by going through technical specs. The pic here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S9200 and ST95.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of pictures although you should factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The younger Fujifilm S9200 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Samsung ST95 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2014-01-06 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 grams (1.48 pounds) | - |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | - |
| Battery format | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $145 |