Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung WB350F
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Introduced January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung WB350F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm S9200 was released around the same time to the WB350F and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short summation of how the Fujifilm S9200 grades versus the WB350F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S9200 & Samsung WB350F. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm S9200 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Samsung WB350F
| Fujifilm S9200 | WB350F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Fujifilm S9200
| WB350F | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Samsung WB350F
| Fujifilm S9200 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | January 2014 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S9200 enjoys outside dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has proportions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung WB350F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 vs the WB350F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9200 and WB350F is 61 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading specifications. The visual underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S9200 and WB350F.
Plainly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same MP and you can expect similar quality of photographs though you need to consider the age of the products into consideration.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm S9200 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Samsung WB350F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-01-06 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 gr (1.48 lbs) | 276 gr (0.61 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | - |
| Battery type | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $260 |