Clicky

Fujifilm S9200 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S9200 front
 
Sigma SD1 Merrill front
Portability
57
Imaging
56
Features
45
Overall
51

Fujifilm S9200 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs

Fujifilm S9200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Launched January 2014
Sigma SD1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
  • Announced April 2012
  • Older Model is Sigma SD1
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm S9200 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview

Here is a extensive analysis of the Fujifilm S9200 and Sigma SD1 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors FujiFilm and Sigma. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is relatively similar but the Fujifilm S9200 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm S9200 was introduced 22 months later than the SD1 Merrill which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the Fujifilm S9200 scores against the SD1 Merrill with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill

 Fujifilm S9200 SD1 Merrill 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014April 2012Fresher by 22 months

Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Fujifilm S9200

 SD1 Merrill Fujifilm S9200 
Manual focus More precise focus

Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Sigma SD1 Merrill

 Fujifilm S9200 SD1 Merrill 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing
Screen resolution460k460kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Fujifilm S9200 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S9200 comes with external measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD1 Merrill has dimensions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") and a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm S9200 and Sigma SD1 Merrill in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 compared to the SD1 Merrill.

Fujifilm S9200 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9200 and SD1 Merrill is 61 and 57 respectively.

Fujifilm S9200 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S9200 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading technical specs. The visual underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S9200 and SD1 Merrill.

As you can tell, both cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm S9200 having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Fujifilm S9200 will offer greater detail using its extra 1MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm S9200 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Fujifilm S9200 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S9200 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S9200 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 Portrait photography factors
Sigma SD1 Merrill Portrait photography factors
37
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
offers face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
65
manual focus
decent megapixels (15 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
does not have liveview
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 Street photography advice
Sigma SD1 Merrill Street photography advice
41
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
more heavy than competition in class (670g)
57
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
weather proofing
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma SD1 Merrill as a Sports photography camera
55
long zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
great battery pack (500 per charge)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
61
decent megapixels (15MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
weather proofing
sensor has phase detect AF
does not have liveview
does not have image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm S9200
Travel photography with Sigma SD1 Merrill
54
great battery pack (500 shots)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
great zoom (1200mm)
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (670g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
54
weather proofing
decent megapixels (15MP)
does not have Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 Landscape photography details
Sigma SD1 Merrill Landscape photography details
44
really wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
great battery pack (500 CIPA)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
missing Timelapse function
63
manual focus
swap lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is good (3")
decent megapixels (15MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
weather proofing
does not have liveview
does not have image stabilization
does not have Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 Vlogging highlights
Sigma SD1 Merrill Vlogging highlights
26
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing external microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (670g)
9
no video recording
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm S9200 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9200 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
 Fujifilm FinePix S9200Sigma SD1 Merrill
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Sigma
Model type Fujifilm FinePix S9200 Sigma SD1 Merrill
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Launched 2014-01-06 2012-04-10
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Chip - Dual True II
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 15 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4800 x 3200
Maximum native ISO 12800 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 24-1200mm (50.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/2.9-6.5 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 76
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 460 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder resolution 201 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 97% 96%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.64x
Features
Min shutter speed 8 seconds -
Max shutter speed 1/1700 seconds -
Continuous shutter rate 10.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 7.00 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro no built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) -
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format H.264 -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 670 grams (1.48 pounds) 790 grams (1.74 pounds)
Dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 images -
Battery style AA -
Battery ID 4 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible)
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $300 $2,339