Fujifilm S9200 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41


57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Fujifilm S9200 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Announced April 2012
- Older Model is Sigma SD1

Fujifilm S9200 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
Here is a extensive analysis of the Fujifilm S9200 and Sigma SD1 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors FujiFilm and Sigma. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is relatively similar but the Fujifilm S9200 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.

The Fujifilm S9200 was introduced 22 months later than the SD1 Merrill which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the Fujifilm S9200 scores against the SD1 Merrill with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Fujifilm S9200 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S9200 and Sigma SD1 Merrill. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S9200 Gallery and Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
Fujifilm S9200 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | ![]() | April 2012 | Fresher by 22 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Fujifilm S9200
SD1 Merrill | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
Fujifilm S9200 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Fujifilm S9200 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S9200 comes with external measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD1 Merrill has dimensions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") and a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm S9200 and Sigma SD1 Merrill in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 compared to the SD1 Merrill.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9200 and SD1 Merrill is 61 and 57 respectively.

Fujifilm S9200 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading technical specs. The visual underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S9200 and SD1 Merrill.
As you can tell, both cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm S9200 having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Fujifilm S9200 will offer greater detail using its extra 1MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm S9200 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Fujifilm S9200 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S9200 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Sigma |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2014-01-06 | 2012-04-10 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual True II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4800 x 3200 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 201 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 97% | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 670 grams (1.48 pounds) | 790 grams (1.74 pounds) |
Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | - |
Battery style | AA | - |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $300 | $2,339 |