Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H300
Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Portability
63 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
63 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H300 Key Specs
Fujifilm S9200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Revealed January 2014
Sony H300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3-5.9) lens
- 590g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Announced February 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H300 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H300, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Sony. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and the H300 (20MP) is very comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm S9200 was revealed around the same time to the H300 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras feature the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the Fujifilm S9200 scores against the H300 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H300 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S9200 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9200 Gallery & Sony H300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Sony H300
| Fujifilm S9200 | H300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony H300 over the Fujifilm S9200
| H300 | Fujifilm S9200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Sony H300
| Fujifilm S9200 | H300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | February 2014 | Same age |
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H300 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S9200 provides exterior dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Sony H300 has measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") along with a weight of 590 grams (1.30 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 vs the H300.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S9200 and H300 is 61 and 63 respectively.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H300 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by going through specifications. The visual here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S9200 and H300.
To sum up, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can expect to see the Sony H300 to show more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H300 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Portrait photography info
Sony H300 Portrait photography info
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
features face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
good megapixels (20MP)
supports face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Street photography advice
Sony H300 Street photography advice
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
heavier than others in class (670 grams)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than others in class (590 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Sports photography highlights
Sony H300 Sports photography highlights
amazing zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
great battery (500 CIPA)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
amazing zoom range (25-875mm 35.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
good battery (350 per charge)
max fps low (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Fujifilm S9200
Travel photography with Sony H300
great battery (500 shots)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long reach (1200mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than others in class (670g)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
good battery (350 CIPA)
good megapixels (20MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (25mm)
long zoom (875mm)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than others in class (590g)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Fujifilm S9200
Landscape photography with Sony H300
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
great battery (500 per charge)
manual focus not available
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
decently wide (25mm)
screen is a good size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
good battery (350 shots)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 as a Vlogging camera
Sony H300 as a Vlogging camera
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
missing external mic socket
heavier than others in class (670g)
decently wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection autofocus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone jack
more heavy than others in class (590 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H300 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-01-06 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz(R) |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201 thousand dot | 201 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 8.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 670g (1.48 pounds) | 590g (1.30 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | 350 images |
| Battery format | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $300 | $249 |
