Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H400
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
![Fujifilm FinePix S9200 front Fujifilm FinePix S9200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-S9200/Fujifilm-S9200-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H400/Sony-H400-front.jpg)
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Released February 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H400 Overview
Below is a complete review of the Fujifilm S9200 and Sony H400, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Sony. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and the H400 (20MP) is pretty similar and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm S9200 was launched around the same time to the H400 which means that they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short summation of how the Fujifilm S9200 grades versus the H400 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H400 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix S9200 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S9200 Gallery and Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Sony H400
Fujifilm S9200 | H400 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Fujifilm S9200
H400 | Fujifilm S9200 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Sony H400
Fujifilm S9200 | H400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | ![]() | February 2014 | Similar generation |
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm S9200 comes with outer measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Sony H400 has specifications of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") with a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm S9200 and Sony H400 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 versus the H400.
![Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H400 size comparison Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H400 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S9200-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H400-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9200 and H400 is 61 and 62 respectively.
![Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H400 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H400 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S9200-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H400-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements merely by going over technical specs. The visual underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S9200 and H400.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should expect the Sony H400 to offer more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots far more aggressively.
![Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H400 sensor size comparison Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H400 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S9200-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H400-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S9200-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H400-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H400 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Sony |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2014-01-06 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz(R) |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5152 x 3864 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.4-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 201k dot | 201k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m | 8.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 X 720 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 670g (1.48 lb) | 628g (1.38 lb) |
Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 300 photos |
Type of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $300 | $268 |