Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H400
Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Portability
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H400 Key Specs
Fujifilm S9200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2014
Sony H400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Released February 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H400 Overview
Below is a complete review of the Fujifilm S9200 and Sony H400, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Sony. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and the H400 (20MP) is pretty similar and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm S9200 was launched around the same time to the H400 which means that they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short summation of how the Fujifilm S9200 grades versus the H400 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H400 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix S9200 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S9200 Gallery and Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Sony H400
| Fujifilm S9200 | H400 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Fujifilm S9200
| H400 | Fujifilm S9200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Sony H400
| Fujifilm S9200 | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | February 2014 | Similar generation |
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm S9200 comes with outer measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Sony H400 has specifications of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") with a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm S9200 and Sony H400 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 versus the H400.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9200 and H400 is 61 and 62 respectively.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements merely by going over technical specs. The visual underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S9200 and H400.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should expect the Sony H400 to offer more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots far more aggressively.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Portrait photography features
Sony H400 Portrait photography features
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
features face detect focus
manual focus not available
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
has face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Street photography features
Sony H400 Street photography features
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
heavier than average (670 grams)
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
heavier than competition (628 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sports photography with Fujifilm S9200
Sports photography with Sony H400
excellent zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
features tracking focus
great battery pack (500 shots)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
great zoom range (25-1550mm 62.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
has tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames per second)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Travel photography highlights
Sony H400 Travel photography highlights
great battery pack (500 CIPA)
resolution is good (16MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
long zoom (1200mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than average (670g)
does not offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
great zoom (1550mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (628g)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Landscape photography factors
Sony H400 Landscape photography factors
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
great battery pack (500 CIPA)
manual focus not available
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
pretty wide (25mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Vlogging highlights
Sony H400 Vlogging highlights
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
does not offer selfie friendly display
lack of mic support
heavier than average (670 grams)
pretty wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
does have mic jack
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
heavier than competition (628 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony H400 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2014-01-06 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz(R) |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.4-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201k dot | 201k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 8.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 X 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 670g (1.48 lb) | 628g (1.38 lb) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | 300 photos |
| Type of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $268 |