Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony HX400V
Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Portability
62 Imaging
45 Features
60 Overall
51
62 Imaging
45 Features
60 Overall
51
Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony HX400V Key Specs
Fujifilm S9200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Revealed January 2014
Sony HX400V
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 660g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Released February 2014
- Previous Model is Sony HX300
Photography Glossary Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony HX400V Overview
The following is a extensive overview of the Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony HX400V, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Sony. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) and the HX400V (20MP) is pretty well matched and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm S9200 was brought out at a similar time to the HX400V so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm S9200 matches up against the HX400V when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony HX400V Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix S9200 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S9200 Gallery & Sony HX400V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Sony HX400V
| Fujifilm S9200 | HX400V |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX400V over the Fujifilm S9200
| HX400V | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9200 and Sony HX400V
| Fujifilm S9200 | HX400V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | February 2014 | Similar age |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony HX400V Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera often, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S9200 has got physical measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Sony HX400V has measurements of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") with a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony HX400V in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm S9200 vs the HX400V.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9200 and HX400V is 61 and 62 respectively.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony HX400V Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading through technical specs. The picture here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S9200 and HX400V.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Sony HX400V to give greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively.
Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony HX400V Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Portrait photography factors
Sony HX400V Portrait photography factors
megapixel count decent (16MP)
provides face detection focus
no manual focus
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
focusing manually
good resolution (20MP)
has face detection autofocus
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Street photography information
Sony HX400V Street photography information
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
more heavy than competitors (670 grams)
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
heavier than average (660 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 as a Sports photography camera
Sony HX400V as a Sports photography camera
great zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
great battery pack (500 CIPA)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
amazing zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (20MP)
has tracking autofocus
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Fujifilm S9200 Travel photography advice
Sony HX400V Travel photography advice
great battery pack (500 per charge)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
very long reach (1200mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors (670g)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.9)
good resolution (20MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
long reach (1200mm)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than average (660 grams)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Fujifilm S9200
Landscape photography with Sony HX400V
rather wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
great battery pack (500 CIPA)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
focusing manually
relatively wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (20MP)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Fujifilm S9200
Vlogging with Sony HX400V
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of external microphone jack
more heavy than competitors (670 grams)
relatively wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
comes with external mic socket
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
heavier than average (660 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm S9200 vs Sony HX400V Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-01-06 | 2014-02-12 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 8.50 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Flash Off / Autoflash / Fill-flash / Slow Sync. / Advanced Flash / Rear Sync. / Wireless (with optional compliant flash) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 gr (1.48 pounds) | 660 gr (1.46 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | 300 shots |
| Battery type | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $448 |