Fujifilm S9400W vs Kodak Z5120
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
68 Imaging
39 Features
42 Overall
40
Fujifilm S9400W vs Kodak Z5120 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Released January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm S9400W vs Kodak Z5120 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Fujifilm S9400W versus Kodak Z5120, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and the Z5120 (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Fujifilm S9400W was manufactured 2 years later than the Z5120 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the Fujifilm S9400W matches up vs the Z5120 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm S9400W vs Kodak Z5120 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix S9400W and Kodak EasyShare Z5120. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm S9400W Gallery and Kodak Z5120 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Kodak Z5120
| Fujifilm S9400W | Z5120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 25 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z5120 over the Fujifilm S9400W
| Z5120 | Fujifilm S9400W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Kodak Z5120
| Fujifilm S9400W | Z5120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Fujifilm S9400W vs Kodak Z5120 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S9400W enjoys physical measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Kodak Z5120 has dimensions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") accompanied by a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).
See the Fujifilm S9400W versus Kodak Z5120 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W vs the Z5120.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9400W and Z5120 is 61 and 68 respectively.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Kodak Z5120 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading through specifications. The graphic underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S9400W and Z5120.
Plainly, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same megapixels and you should expect similar quality of pictures however you may want to consider the production date of the products into consideration. The more modern Fujifilm S9400W is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Kodak Z5120 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm S9400W vs Kodak Z5120 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Kodak EasyShare Z5120 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Kodak EasyShare Z5120 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-01-06 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 2456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 8.90 m |
| Flash options | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 gr (1.48 lb) | 445 gr (0.98 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | - |
| Form of battery | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $330 | $200 |