Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SH-2
Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Portability
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Introduced January 2014
Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced March 2015
- Superseded the Olympus SH-1
- Updated by Olympus SH-3
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SH-2, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and the SH-2 (16MP) is very similar and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm S9400W was launched 14 months prior to the SH-2 making them a generation away from each other. Both cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm S9400W grades vs the SH-2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S9400W & Olympus Stylus SH-2. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9400W Gallery & Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Olympus SH-2
| Fujifilm S9400W | SH-2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Fujifilm S9400W
| SH-2 | Fujifilm S9400W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2015 |  | January 2014 | Newer by 14 months |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Olympus SH-2
| Fujifilm S9400W | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S9400W comes with external measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Olympus SH-2 has dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SH-2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W and the SH-2.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9400W and SH-2 is 61 and 88 respectively.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading specs. The pic here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S9400W and SH-2.
All in all, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of images though you need to factor the age of the products into consideration. The more aged Fujifilm S9400W is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus SH-2 as a Portrait photography camera
resolution is good (16MP)
offers face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
supports face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Street photography information
Olympus SH-2 Street photography information
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
more heavy than average in class (670g)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
offers touch focus
lighter than others in class (271 grams)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Sports photography features
Olympus SH-2 Sports photography features
excellent zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (500 CIPA)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
supports tracking focus
great battery (380 CIPA)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Travel photography factors
Olympus SH-2 Travel photography factors
better than average battery power (500 shots)
resolution is good (16MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1200mm)
missing Timelapse recording
more heavy than average in class (670g)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
great battery (380 CIPA)
lighter than others in class (271 grams)
offers touch focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (25mm)
long reach (600mm)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Landscape photography information
Olympus SH-2 Landscape photography information
decently wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
better than average battery power (500 shots)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
missing Timelapse recording
relatively wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
saves RAW formats
great battery (380 CIPA)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Vlogging advice
Olympus SH-2 Vlogging advice
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
missing external microphone jack
more heavy than average in class (670 grams)
relatively wide (25mm)
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others in class (271 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
doesn't have microphone port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-01-06 | 2015-03-11 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 11.5 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 grams (1.48 pounds) | 271 grams (0.60 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | 380 images |
| Type of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $330 | $399 |