Clicky

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Announced January 2014
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced July 2011
  • Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Here is a thorough overview of the Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Fujifilm S9400W was unveiled 2 years later than the VR-320 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.

Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the Fujifilm S9400W matches up against the VR-320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm S9400W VR-320 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014July 2011Fresher by 31 months
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm S9400W

 VR-320 Fujifilm S9400W 

Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm S9400W VR-320 
Focus manually No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen size
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S9400W enjoys exterior dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

See the Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W vs the VR-320.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9400W and VR-320 is 61 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing only by seeing specifications. The visual underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S9400W and VR-320.

To sum up, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Fujifilm S9400W to produce greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm S9400W is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Portrait photography advice
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography advice
37
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
has face detect autofocus
no manual focus
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
33
decent MP (14 megapixels)
provides face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm S9400W
Street photography with Olympus VR-320
41
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
more heavy than average (670g)
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158g)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Sports photography features
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography features
55
long zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
has tracking focus
good battery (500 shots)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
47
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
no shutter priority
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Travel photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography highlights
54
good battery (500 CIPA)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
very long reach (1200mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than average (670 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
70
lighter than competition in class (158g)
decent MP (14MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Landscape photography camera
44
quite wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
good battery (500 shots)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
does not have Timelapse mode
42
rather wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Vlogging features
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging features
26
quite wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have microphone port
more heavy than average (670g)
32
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect autofocus
lighter than competition in class (158g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9400W and Olympus VR-320
 Fujifilm FinePix S9400WOlympus VR-320
General Information
Make FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix S9400W Olympus VR-320
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2014-01-06 2011-07-19
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 12800 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximum aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology TFT LCD TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 201k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 97 percent -
Features
Min shutter speed 8 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/1700 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 10.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 7.00 m 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 670 grams (1.48 lb) 158 grams (0.35 lb)
Dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 shots -
Type of battery AA -
Battery ID 4 x AA LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal SD/SDHC
Card slots 1 1
Launch pricing $330 $179