Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
![Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-S9400W/Fujifilm-S9400W-front.jpg)
![Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-VR-320/Olympus-VR-320-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Here is a thorough overview of the Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm S9400W was unveiled 2 years later than the VR-320 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the Fujifilm S9400W matches up against the VR-320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix S9400W and Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S9400W Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Olympus VR-320
Fujifilm S9400W | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | ![]() | July 2011 | Fresher by 31 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm S9400W
VR-320 | Fujifilm S9400W |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Olympus VR-320
Fujifilm S9400W | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S9400W enjoys exterior dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W vs the VR-320.
![Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S9400W-vs-Olympus-VR-320-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9400W and VR-320 is 61 and 94 respectively.
![Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S9400W-vs-Olympus-VR-320-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing only by seeing specifications. The visual underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S9400W and VR-320.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Fujifilm S9400W to produce greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm S9400W is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
![Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S9400W-vs-Olympus-VR-320-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-S9400W-vs-Olympus-VR-320-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Olympus VR-320 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2014-01-06 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 201k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 670 grams (1.48 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | - |
Type of battery | AA | - |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $330 | $179 |