Clicky

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-330

Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front
 
Olympus VR-330 front
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs

Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed February 2011
  • Replaced the Olympus VR-320
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-330 Overview

Here is a extensive assessment of the Fujifilm S9400W and Olympus VR-330, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The Fujifilm S9400W was announced 2 years later than the VR-330 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.

Before going into a full comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm S9400W scores versus the VR-330 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Olympus VR-330

		

		

			
 Fujifilm S9400W VR-330 
RevealedJanuary 2014February 2011Fresher by 36 months
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Fujifilm S9400W

		

		

			
 VR-330 Fujifilm S9400W 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Olympus VR-330

		

		

			
 Fujifilm S9400W VR-330 
Manual focus  Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurement
Screen resolution460k460kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen  Neither provides selfie screen
Touch screen  Lacking Touch screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
If you're intending to carry your camera, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm S9400W provides external measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm S9400W and Olympus VR-330 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W against the VR-330.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9400W and VR-330 is 61 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Typically, its difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading technical specs. The graphic here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S9400W and VR-330.
As you can tell, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Fujifilm S9400W to offer extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm S9400W should have an edge in sensor technology.
	
			Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Fujifilm S9400W
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-330
37
 MP count good (16 megapixels)
 includes face detect focus
 focusing manually not possible
 external flash not possible
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW format
33
 decent sensor resolution (14MP)
 comes with face detection focusing
 no manual focus
 no manual control
 no external flash support
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Street Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Street photography advice
Olympus VR-330 Street photography advice
41
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 screen is fixed
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW format
 heavier than competition in class (670 grams)
62
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than others (158 grams)
 fixed screen
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Sports Comparison
 Fujifilm S9400W as a Sports photography camera
 Olympus VR-330 as a Sports photography camera
55
 long zoom range (24-1200mm  50.0 x zoom)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 MP count good (16 megapixels)
 includes tracking focus
 better than average battery life (500 per charge)
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have phase detect auto focus
47
 incredible zoom range (24-300mm  12.5 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
 comes with tracking autofocus
 lack of shutter priority mode
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Travel Comparison
Travel photography with Fujifilm S9400W
Travel photography with Olympus VR-330
54
 better than average battery life (500 shots)
 MP count good (16MP)
 built-in flash
 decently wide (24mm)
 great reach (1200mm)
 no Time Lapse function
 heavier than competition in class (670g)
 display is not selfie friendly
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
70
 lighter than others (158 grams)
 decent sensor resolution (14MP)
 built-in flash
 rather wide (24mm)
 long reach (300mm)
 missing Time Lapse mode
 screen is not selfie friendly
 slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Landscape Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Landscape photography highlights
Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography highlights
44
 decently wide (24mm)
 nice screen size (3 inch)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 MP count good (16 megapixels)
 better than average battery life (500 shots)
 focusing manually not possible
 can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW format
 no Time Lapse function
42
 rather wide (24mm)
 screen size is decent (3")
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent sensor resolution (14MP)
 no manual focus
 can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
 no manual control
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW files
 missing Time Lapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Vlogging features
Olympus VR-330 Vlogging features
26
 decently wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 includes face detect focus
 high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
 display is not selfie friendly
 no mic socket
 heavier than competition in class (670 grams)
32
 rather wide (24mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 comes with face detection focusing
 lighter than others (158g)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
 missing external mic jack
Photography Glossary
	

		

			
Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9400W and Olympus VR-330
 Fujifilm FinePix S9400WOlympus VR-330
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix S9400W Olympus VR-330
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2014-01-06 2011-02-08
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3 and  16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 12800 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW support    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Touch focus    
Autofocus continuous    
Single autofocus    
Autofocus tracking    
Autofocus selectice    
Center weighted autofocus    
Multi area autofocus    
Live view autofocus    
Face detection autofocus    
Contract detection autofocus    
Phase detection autofocus    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Largest aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 460k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch screen    
Screen technology TFT LCD TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 201k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 97 percent -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/1700 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 10.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash distance 7.00 m 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash    
AE bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 670g (1.48 pounds) 158g (0.35 pounds)
Physical dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 images -
Form of battery AA -
Battery ID 4 x AA LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording    
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal SD/SDHC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $330 $220