Fujifilm S9400W vs Panasonic ZS35
Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Portability
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Fujifilm S9400W vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2014
Panasonic ZS35
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Released January 2014
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS30
- Updated by Panasonic ZS40
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm S9400W vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Below is a extensive assessment of the Fujifilm S9400W vs Panasonic ZS35, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and the ZS35 (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm S9400W was brought out within a month of the ZS35 so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm S9400W grades vs the ZS35 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm S9400W vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S9400W & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9400W Gallery & Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Panasonic ZS35
| Fujifilm S9400W | ZS35 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Fujifilm S9400W
| ZS35 | Fujifilm S9400W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Panasonic ZS35
| Fujifilm S9400W | ZS35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | January 2014 | Similar age |
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Fujifilm S9400W vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S9400W provides external dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS35 has measurements of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm S9400W vs Panasonic ZS35 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W against the ZS35.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9400W and ZS35 is 61 and 89 respectively.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to visualize the gap between sensor measurements only by reading specifications. The graphic here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S9400W and ZS35.
Plainly, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same resolution so you can expect similar quality of pictures however you should always consider the age of the products into consideration.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Fujifilm S9400W
Portrait photography with Panasonic ZS35
MP count good (16 megapixels)
has face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has face detection focus
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Street photography with Fujifilm S9400W
Street photography with Panasonic ZS35
image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
heavier than average in class (670 grams)
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (305g)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Sports photography factors
Panasonic ZS35 Sports photography factors
long zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
has tracking focus
good battery power (500 per charge)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
long zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Travel photography highlights
Panasonic ZS35 Travel photography highlights
good battery power (500 shots)
MP count good (16MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
long zoom (1200mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than average in class (670 grams)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
lighter than competition in class (305g)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
very long reach (480mm)
does not have Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Landscape photography highlights
Panasonic ZS35 Landscape photography highlights
fairly wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
good battery power (500 CIPA)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
missing Time Lapse recording
really wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Fujifilm S9400W
Vlogging with Panasonic ZS35
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
missing mic socket
heavier than average in class (670 grams)
really wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (305 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have external microphone support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm S9400W vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Panasonic |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
| Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2014-01-06 | 2014-01-06 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 21 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 6.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 gr (1.48 lb) | 305 gr (0.67 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
| Battery style | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $330 | $300 |