Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung PL120
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
99 Imaging
36 Features
20 Overall
29
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung PL120 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Announced January 2011
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung PL120 Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Fujifilm S9400W versus Samsung PL120, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and the PL120 (14MP) is very similar and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm S9400W was unveiled 3 years later than the PL120 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung PL120 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm S9400W grades versus the PL120 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung PL120 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S9400W & Samsung PL120. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm S9400W Gallery & Samsung PL120 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Samsung PL120
| Fujifilm S9400W | PL120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 | January 2011 | More recent by 37 months | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL120 over the Fujifilm S9400W
| PL120 | Fujifilm S9400W |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung PL120
| Fujifilm S9400W | PL120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung PL120 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm S9400W has got outer dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Samsung PL120 has specifications of 94mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm S9400W versus Samsung PL120 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W compared to the PL120.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9400W and PL120 is 61 and 99 respectively.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung PL120 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading technical specs. The graphic below will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S9400W and PL120.
As you have seen, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Fujifilm S9400W to deliver extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm S9400W provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung PL120 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung PL120 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Samsung PL120 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Samsung PL120 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2014-01-06 | 2011-01-05 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 670 gr (1.48 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | AA | - |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | - |
| Card slots | One | - |
| Pricing at launch | $330 | $150 |