Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung SL202
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL50
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung SL202 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung SL202, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm S9400W was manufactured 4 years after the SL202 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the Fujifilm S9400W grades versus the SL202 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S9400W & Samsung SL202. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9400W Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Samsung SL202
| Fujifilm S9400W | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 60 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Fujifilm S9400W
| SL202 | Fujifilm S9400W |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung SL202
| Fujifilm S9400W | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S9400W features external measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung SL202 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W versus the SL202.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S9400W and SL202 is 61 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor dimensions just by researching specs. The pic below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S9400W and SL202.
All in all, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Fujifilm S9400W to provide you with extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm S9400W will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Samsung SL202 |
| Otherwise known as | - | PL50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-01-06 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 gr (1.48 lbs) | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
| Battery form | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $330 | $140 |