Clicky

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung SL720

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front
 
Samsung SL720 front
Portability
94
Imaging
34
Features
14
Overall
26

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung SL720 Key Specs

Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Released January 2014
Samsung SL720
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Announced July 2009
  • Alternative Name is PL70
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung SL720 Overview

Following is a complete comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W versus Samsung SL720, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and SL720 (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm S9400W was manufactured 4 years after the SL720 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL720 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the Fujifilm S9400W scores versus the SL720 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

				

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Samsung SL720

 Fujifilm S9400W SL720 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014July 2009More modern by 55 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung SL720 over the Fujifilm S9400W

 SL720 Fujifilm S9400W 

Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung SL720

 Fujifilm S9400W SL720 
Focus manually No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung SL720 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you should factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S9400W offers outside measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL720 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

See the Fujifilm S9400W versus Samsung SL720 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W and the SL720.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung SL720 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9400W and SL720 is 61 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung SL720 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung SL720 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S9400W and SL720.

As you can see, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can expect the Fujifilm S9400W to provide greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm S9400W should have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung SL720 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung SL720 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung SL720 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Portrait photography advice
Samsung SL720 Portrait photography advice
37
MP count good (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
20
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Street photography advice
Samsung SL720 Street photography advice
41
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
more heavy than competition in class (670 grams)
47
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (168g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Sports photography factors
Samsung SL720 Sports photography factors
55
incredible zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
good battery (500 per charge)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
17
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Travel photography details
Samsung SL720 Travel photography details
54
good battery (500 per charge)
MP count good (16MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
very long reach (1200mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (670 grams)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
55
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (168 grams)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm S9400W
Landscape photography with Samsung SL720
44
relatively wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
good battery (500 CIPA)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Timelapse recording
27
pretty wide (28mm)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7")
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Vlogging highlights
Samsung SL720 Vlogging highlights
26
relatively wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
lack of external microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (670 grams)
25
pretty wide (28mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (168g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung SL720 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung SL720
 Fujifilm FinePix S9400WSamsung SL720
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Samsung
Model Fujifilm FinePix S9400W Samsung SL720
Alternate name - PL70
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Released 2014-01-06 2009-07-14
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 12800 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Highest aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focus range 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 460 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 201 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 97% -
Features
Min shutter speed 8 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/1700 secs 1/1500 secs
Continuous shutter rate 10.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 7.00 m 4.60 m
Flash modes Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 670 gr (1.48 pounds) 168 gr (0.37 pounds)
Dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 pictures -
Form of battery AA -
Battery model 4 x AA SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at release $330 $119