Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung ST65
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Released January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung ST65 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Fujifilm S9400W versus Samsung ST65, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is fairly similar and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm S9400W was brought out 3 years later than the ST65 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm S9400W scores versus the ST65 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S9400W & Samsung ST65. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9400W Gallery & Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Samsung ST65
| Fujifilm S9400W | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 37 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Fujifilm S9400W
| ST65 | Fujifilm S9400W |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung ST65
| Fujifilm S9400W | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S9400W has got external dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST65 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm S9400W versus Samsung ST65 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W versus the ST65.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S9400W and ST65 is 61 and 99 respectively.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading technical specs. The photograph here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S9400W and ST65.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Fujifilm S9400W to deliver extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm S9400W is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Samsung ST65 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Samsung ST65 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2014-01-06 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | () |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670g (1.48 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $330 | $130 |