Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung ST6500
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
99 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung ST6500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 102 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung ST6500 Overview
Following is a comprehensive comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung ST6500, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and the ST6500 (16MP) is very close and they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm S9400W was launched 3 years after the ST6500 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST6500 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the Fujifilm S9400W grades vs the ST6500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung ST6500 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix S9400W & Samsung ST6500. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9400W Gallery & Samsung ST6500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Samsung ST6500
| Fujifilm S9400W | ST6500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 37 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST6500 over the Fujifilm S9400W
| ST6500 | Fujifilm S9400W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung ST6500
| Fujifilm S9400W | ST6500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung ST6500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S9400W offers external dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST6500 has measurements of 102mm x 57mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung ST6500 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W compared to the ST6500.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S9400W and ST6500 is 61 and 99 respectively.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung ST6500 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes only by researching technical specs. The pic below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S9400W and ST6500.
As you have seen, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of pictures though you have to factor the age of the cameras into account. The newer Fujifilm S9400W provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung ST6500 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung ST6500 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Samsung ST6500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Samsung ST6500 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2014-01-06 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670g (1.48 pounds) | - |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 102 x 57 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | - |
| Battery type | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $330 | - |