Clicky

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL100

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front
 
Samsung TL100 front
Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL100 Key Specs

Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Launched January 2014
Samsung TL100
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
  • 219g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
  • Launched January 2009
  • Alternate Name is ST50
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL100 Overview

Here is a in-depth overview of the Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL100, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and TL100 (12MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The Fujifilm S9400W was brought out 5 years later than the TL100 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung TL100 being a Compact camera.

Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm S9400W matches up against the TL100 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Samsung TL100

 Fujifilm S9400W TL100 
LaunchedJanuary 2014January 2009Fresher by 61 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung TL100 over the Fujifilm S9400W

 TL100 Fujifilm S9400W 

Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung TL100

 Fujifilm S9400W TL100 
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL100 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S9400W has got external dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Samsung TL100 has dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 219 grams (0.48 lbs).

Take a look at the Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL100 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W and the TL100.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL100 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S9400W and TL100 is 61 and 91 respectively.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL100 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL100 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing merely by checking specs. The graphic below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S9400W and TL100.

All in all, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Fujifilm S9400W to resolve more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm S9400W is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL100 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL100 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Portrait photography factors
Samsung TL100 Portrait photography factors
37
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides face detect focus
no manual focus
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
26
supports face detection focus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Street photography advice
Samsung TL100 Street photography advice
41
image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
more heavy than competition in class (670 grams)
53
image stabilization (Digital)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
more heavy than competition in class (219 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Sports photography advice
Samsung TL100 Sports photography advice
55
long zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
good battery power (500 CIPA)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
34
image stabilization (Digital)
supports tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Travel photography factors
Samsung TL100 Travel photography factors
54
good battery power (500 per charge)
good megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
long zoom (1200mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (670g)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
49
built-in flash
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (219g)
low megapixels (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Landscape photography highlights
Samsung TL100 Landscape photography highlights
44
quite wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
good battery power (500 shots)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
27
image stabilization (Digital)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
missing Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Vlogging information
Samsung TL100 Vlogging information
26
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
doesn't have microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (670g)
26
image stabilization (Digital)
supports face detection focus
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (219g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm S9400W vs Samsung TL100 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9400W and Samsung TL100
 Fujifilm FinePix S9400WSamsung TL100
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Samsung
Model Fujifilm FinePix S9400W Samsung TL100
Also called - ST50
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2014-01-06 2009-01-08
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 12800 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.0-5.6
Macro focus distance 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 460 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 201 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 97% -
Features
Min shutter speed 8 seconds 1 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/1700 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 10.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 7.00 m -
Flash options Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 800 x 592 (20 fps) , 640 x 480 (30,15 fps) , 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 670 grams (1.48 lbs) 219 grams (0.48 lbs)
Dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 pictures -
Type of battery AA -
Battery model 4 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal SD/MMC/SDHC card
Card slots Single Single
Price at release $330 $22